of RCL - reduced capacity for work could write a bunch of definitions. And the opposite of themselves. A documentary. Yes, but maybe not. A fiction film, in part, but maybe not. Genre realistic. Undoubtedly, but maybe not. Surrealist, no doubt, but maybe not. And so on. Alessandro Di Rienzo, a young reporter Ami agency, conceived the film in the crucial hours of the referendum announced by Fiat to the establishment of Giambattista Vico Pomigliano D'Arco. On the one hand, the investment in the territory of the other workers' rights on the one hand the specter of unemployment in the land of the Camorra, the other achievements of the workers put in a drawer. Hence the desire to talk about a situation of obvious delicacy, in a non-controversial, non-journalism "to Annozero, Report and BallarĂ² as mentioned in the film itself, without blatant intentions of complaint to Michael Moore, for instance. Here's the comedian Paolo Rossi, panama with white, wanders through the streets of a ramshackle crew Pomigliano very 'armata Brancaleone. He met the mayor (right), the parish priest (left-most), the workers, the citizens of Pomigliano. It seeks to understand and to photograph a reality, with a light touch and ironic, surreal in fact. Rossi wants to make a film about the events of Pomigliano and seems to be the best kind of science fiction ...
Overall we laugh through clenched teeth. The film, in my view, owes much to the theatricality of Paolo Rossi, not only because of its shape, but this very setting of some scenes. There I saw the atmosphere and reminders of his last plays. And of making the film a theatrical space is like an interesting experiment. From appreciate the desire not to impose a vision from the outset, that, after 70 minutes of film, the viewer is relaunched. There is too much "meat to cook" in Pomigliano Affair (rights, employment, investment, and not excessive absenteeism, the problem of the assembly line .... perhaps the hallmark of the film) to show a strongly or the other. The flaw of the film, however, lies in its construction "cinema", perhaps too hasty. The time and on budget to implement it were minimal, but a greater effort in the characterization aesthetic of the work and the work of writing was not bad at all: perhaps a more appropriate use of music, a desire to place greater emphasis on the ironic side of burlesque-Rossi, a more interesting job in the assembly.
0 comments:
Post a Comment